On Jul 7, 2012, at 18:34, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> For backups, not really for file transfers, there's my pet project, backshift:
> http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/backshift/
That looks very cool. I've been using rsnapshot for awhile, but this looks very
interesting.
--
Please use reply
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Henri Shustak wrote:
>
> > Wow! Thanks for making it so easy. I will try that asap.
>
> If you do not have any luck with the patched version of rsync there are
> various projects which spring to mind which offer this kind of
> functionality.
>
For backups, not re
> Wow! Thanks for making it so easy. I will try that asap.
If you do not have any luck with the patched version of rsync there are various
projects which spring to mind which offer this kind of functionality.
However, I would suggest that rsync is the most stable project I have ever seen
fo
Wow! Thanks for making it so easy. I will try that asap.
Joe
> hello,
>
> I have patched my rsync with both patches, and it works well !
> Using git just for geting the source code is really easy and moreover
> rsync
> source code is not under git... See the project page where you can
> downloa
hello,
I have patched my rsync with both patches, and it works well !
Using git just for geting the source code is really easy and moreover rsync
source code is not under git... See the project page where you can download
the source code : http://rsync.samba.org/download.html
There is no risk to b
Let us know if that ever gets merged into the official releases. I could
use that feature. I download a lot of media files and when I normalize
their names, rsync treats them as new files.
At this point, I don't want to build my own rsync. I haven't learned git
yet and have to be sure that I do
hello,
a patch could help you in the case of a move or rename of a file :
Patch : --detect-renamed
(1) match in size & modify-time (plus the basename, if possible)
(2) or match in size & checksum (when --checksum was also specified) and
use each match as an alternate basis file to speed up the tr
On 05.07.2012 09:26, Yan Seiner wrote:
> Is it possible to tell rsync *not* to use file names, date stamps, etc and
> only use the checksum for deciding if a file is the same?
>
> the remote machine "normalizes" a set of file names to remove all
> punctuation marks and forces all file names to low
On Thu, July 5, 2012 10:10 am, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:26:05AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
>> Is it possible to tell rsync *not* to use file names, date stamps, etc
>> and
>> only use the checksum for deciding if a file is the same?
>>
>> the remote machine "normalizes" a s
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:26:05AM -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
> Is it possible to tell rsync *not* to use file names, date stamps, etc and
> only use the checksum for deciding if a file is the same?
>
> the remote machine "normalizes" a set of file names to remove all
> punctuation marks and forces
Is it possible to tell rsync *not* to use file names, date stamps, etc and
only use the checksum for deciding if a file is the same?
the remote machine "normalizes" a set of file names to remove all
punctuation marks and forces all file names to lower case. The files
themselves are unchanged.
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
