As an example, I transfered 1930420 KBytes with rsync between two 2.8 GHz Intel
P4 machines over gigabit ethernet and got this:
transfer method:ssh rshnfs rsync
wall time in sec 130.01 79.77 176.03 74.92
MBit/sec116 189 86201
Mind you, this is no benchmark as I
> > How do you call rsync?
>
> rsync -av --delete --perms --acls ...
You left out the rest. Specifically, what protocol
are you using over the ethernet? Are you using an
rsync server, ssh, NFS, SMB, or what? A straight
rsync server is by far the fastest, I've found. So
you'd do something lik
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao F
> ask rsync to be slower ?!?
>
> How do you call rsync?
rsync -av --delete --perms --acls ...
> Do you use zipping?
I don't explicitlly ask for it ?
What's the default behaviour ? to use zipping or
For situations where it's all new files, using -W would make it a lot
more efficient and less CPU intensive.
You can ask rsync to be slower with it's built in bandwidth limiting
options.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:14:02PM +0100, Joao Ferreira wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabia
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I'm experiencing about 20MBit/s on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when
> >rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files.
> >
> >I don't have much exeprience with rsync.
At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I'm experiencing about 20MBit/s on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when
>rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files.
>
>I don't have much exeprience with rsync. I'dd just like to know if thi
>is an acceptable bw usage and what could
Hello all,
I'm experiencing about 20MBit/s on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when
rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files.
I don't have much exeprience with rsync. I'dd just like to know if thi
is an acceptable bw usage and what could be the limiting factors... in
order to try to increase this s
