Re: rsync 2.5.5 --delete-after option bug

2002-04-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I think --delete-after should imply --delete. Would someone like to > work up the simple patch to the code and the man page? Sure. Here's one (note that the OPT_DELETE_AFTER enum was already defined for some reason). ..wayne.. ---8<--8<--8<--

Re: rsync 2.5.5 --delete-after option bug

2002-04-25 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:08:56PM -0400, Corey Stup wrote: > > > The option --delete-after does not seem to work. > > > > In a command such as > > > > rysnc -avzSH --progress --stats --delete-after remote::XYZ/dirX /export/home > > files removed from the source are not removed at the d

Re: rsync 2.5.5 --delete-after option bug

2002-04-23 Thread Corey Stup
> The option --delete-after does not seem to work. > > In a command such as > > rysnc -avzSH --progress --stats --delete-after remote::XYZ/dirX /export/home > files removed from the source are not removed at the destination. > However subsituting --delete for --delete-after does cause

rsync 2.5.5 --delete-after option bug

2002-04-23 Thread Greg Brissey
FYI, The option --delete-after does not seem to work. In a command such as rysnc -avzSH --progress --stats --delete-after remote::XYZ/dirX /export/home files removed from the source are not removed at the destination. However subsituting --delete for --delete-after does cause the fil