Andreas Kotes wrote:
> > >> There is no license issue.
>
> There would be a serious licence issue the other way round, but BSD is a
> tad more permissive than the GPL is, so - no problem there BUT: there is
> an advertisement clause, so rsync would need to display certain messages
> when compiled
Carson,
My mistake- read "SSL", immediately started thinking "ssh",
and issues there. No excuse.
So- my comments aren't applicable to the SSL-for-real discussion -
apologies to the list.
(Aside: the issues with ssh are not about modifying TCP buffers.
They are about a fixed-size ssh-
On 4/18/07, Andreas Kotes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is just a troll.
just who exactly are you talking about? ;)
Ahem... That would be me. That will be $10 for posting in this list. :-)
--
Aaron W Morris (decep)
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/
Hello,
* Aaron W Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070419 02:25]:
> >>> This still applies (depending on the ssl toolkit being used). The
> >>> problem referenced here is the TCP window size is hard coded inside
> >>> the openssl library. In order to change the window size, one must
> >>> patch open
>> This still applies (depending on the ssl toolkit being used). The
>> problem referenced here is the TCP window size is hard coded inside
>> the openssl library. In order to change the window size, one must
>> patch openssl.
>
> TCP window size is not, and can not, be hard coded inside openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
that was a little harsh
Carson Gaspar wrote:
> Aaron W Morris wrote:
>> On 4/18/07, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
>>> > Colleagues,
>>> > If you do pursue SSL functionality directly in rsync,
>>> > please be
Aaron W Morris wrote:
On 4/18/07, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
> Colleagues,
> If you do pursue SSL functionality directly in rsync,
> please be sure to take a look at Chris Rapier's work
> to "fix" standard ssh implementations, at:
> http://www.psc.ed
On 4/18/07, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
> Colleagues,
> If you do pursue SSL functionality directly in rsync,
> please be sure to take a look at Chris Rapier's work
> to "fix" standard ssh implementations, at:
> http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/h
Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
Colleagues,
If you do pursue SSL functionality directly in rsync,
please be sure to take a look at Chris Rapier's work
to "fix" standard ssh implementations, at:
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
Turns out "-e ssh" using most libraries puts a fixed
Colleagues,
If you do pursue SSL functionality directly in rsync,
please be sure to take a look at Chris Rapier's work
to "fix" standard ssh implementations, at:
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
Turns out "-e ssh" using most libraries puts a fixed-window-size
ssh-windowi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:52:57PM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> I'd be willing to put up the effort to add full (or at least better)
> SSL support direclty to rsync if the maintainers would agree with it,
> and would seriously consider including it in the main source in the
> long run.
I'd be int
Dear All,
I've been using rsync with stunnel with success for a while now, but I'm
not necessarily satisfied with it, i.e. having an extra layer externally
and all, no authentication against SSL-subjects ..
I had a look at the patch included with the source, and it doesn't quite
address everythin
> if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or another?
It's been done for some time. See 'stunnel' at Google.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.
>On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:17, Justin Banks wrote:
>> Hello -
>> I'd like to encrypt rsync traffic over the wire, and for various
>> reasons, I can't use ssh. I'd like to use SSL. Having spent the
last day or
>> so trying to wrap my brain around what that's going to take, I'm
wondering
>> if any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:17, Justin Banks wrote:
> Hello -
> I'd like to encrypt rsync traffic over the wire, and for various
> reasons, I can't use ssh. I'd like to use SSL. Having spent the last day or
> so trying to wrap my brain around what th
Hello -
I'd like to encrypt rsync traffic over the wire, and for various
reasons, I can't use ssh. I'd like to use SSL. Having spent the last day or
so trying to wrap my brain around what that's going to take, I'm wondering
if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or
16 matches
Mail list logo
