On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Steve G wrote:
> I don't know if this amounts to much, but did you intend to use a &
> rather than a && at line 739 of flist.c?
Fortunately both items in the "&" expression can only have the value of
1 or 0, so the effect is the same as "&&". It looks like a typo to me,
thoug
Hello,
I don't know if this amounts to much, but did you
intend to use a & rather than a && at line 739 of
flist.c?
Also, lines 101 & 279 of io.c have a shift right of a
signed value. If they could never ever be a negative
number, the variable might ought to be change to
unsigned.
Cheers,
Steve
