Re: rsync: future of the --server option

2002-01-25 Thread Martin Pool
On 25 Jan 2002, "Martin A. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anybody here shed any light for me on whether or not the --server > option is here to stay? Yes it is. I guess it would be OK to have a manual section that says they're for internal use only. -- Martin

Re: rsync: future of the --server option

2002-01-25 Thread Martin A. Brown
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: rsync: future of the --server option : : Hello list members, : : I notice here that the --server option is listed as undocumented. : : http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/fom-serve/cache/88.html : : My question is that t

Re: rsync: future of the --server option

2002-01-24 Thread tim . conway
ED] cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS) Subject:rsync: future of the --server option Classification: Hello list members, I notice here that the --server option is listed as undocumented. http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/fom-serve/cache/88.html My que

rsync: future of the --server option

2002-01-24 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hello list members, I notice here that the --server option is listed as undocumented. http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/fom-serve/cache/88.html My question is that the --server option is not documented, and I'd like not to build functionality into one of my systems without trusting that it w