Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2010-02-09 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 07:21 +, tom raschel wrote: > i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. > unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe > error. > (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a > reconnect ev

Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-15 Thread Tom
OK, have tried now --inplace with --backup option but syncing the files does consume much more time than a normal rsync process, so this is not a reliable solution. Thx Tom "Tom" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:hg7dg6$em...@ger.gmane.org... > Hi, > > retransfer of large fail with inplace after a

Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-14 Thread Tom
Hi, retransfer of large fail with inplace after a broken pipe is working now. (thx again to wayne) but it is much more slow as if a "normal" rsync job. I have read that setting the --backup option could help. (have not tried it yet) But --backup option would halve the space, which is not desira

Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-13 Thread Tom
Thx to all, it was the -u option which prevents rsync to resume the file. Tom "Tony Abernethy" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:af5ef1769d564645a9acc947375f0d021567087...@winxbeus13.exchange.xchg... > Tom wrote: >> to make things more clear >> >> 1.) >> first transfer is done either a initial setup

Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-13 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:21 PM, tom raschel wrote: > so i had a look at --inplace which I thougt could do the trick, but inplace > is updating the timestamp and if the script start a retransfer after a > broken pipe it fails because the --inplace file is newer than the original > file of the se

RE: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-13 Thread Tony Abernethy
Tom wrote: > to make things more clear > > 1.) > first transfer is done either a initial setup or with a usb hdd to get > sender and receiver in sync. > > 2.) > transfer does not stop because rsync had a timeout, it stops because > the dsl > line is broken (which i could see at dyndns) > > 3) >

Re: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-12 Thread Tom
>> to make things more clear 1.) first transfer is done either a initial setup or with a usb hdd to get sender and receiver in sync. 2.) transfer does not stop because rsync had a timeout, it stops because the dsl line is broken (which i could see at dyndns) 3) if dsl line is stable the transf

RE: retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-12 Thread Tony Abernethy
tom raschel wrote: > Hi, > > i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. > unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken > pipe error. > (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a > reconnect every 24 hours) > > i had a sc

retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

2009-12-12 Thread tom raschel
Hi, i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error. (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a reconnect every 24 hours) i had a script which detect the rsync error a