https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
Summary: Combination of --remove-sent-files, --partial, --
partial-dir, --tmp-dir and --delay-updates can cause
data loss
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: x64
On 8/8/07, Akshay Kulkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to transfer a bunch of files, and then delete only those files
> from the source that match a certain pattern. It would be nice to have a
> filter rule to specify include and exclude patterns for the
> --remove-sen
I want to transfer a bunch of files, and then delete only those files
from the source that match a certain pattern. It would be nice to have a
filter rule to specify include and exclude patterns for the
--remove-sent-files option. As far as I know, currently there is no such
rule. The way I&#
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:47:38PM -0700, Eric Aiken wrote:
> What troubles me even is, using rsync -vvv, rsync shows no output
> relating to the --remove-sent-files option.
You would have seen the messages with just -vv if it were successful at
removing the files. For some strange reas
I've been experimenting with the --remove-sent-files option with patchy
success.
Often --remove-sent-files will not remove the remote files. It copies
them locally but "apparently" failed to remove them remotely. After
some experimentation I was able to identify one problem
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:05:10PM -0500, Evan Harris wrote:
> So, I agree with the parent message that either --remove-sent-files should
> delete the files immediately after they are successfully sent, or a new
> option should be added (--move maybe?) that does it that way.
It can ne
I've looked back through my mailing list archives, and seen a few messages
touching on the same things I wanted to mention, but I figured it might be
better to recap, since most of them were sent more than a year ago.
I have recently started using the --remove-sent-files option, and
> Having --remove-sent-files is definitely an improvement but if it fails
> it will still have to do checks against files that it didn't need to
> sync over. If I am trying to sync over a large amount of files (10k+)
> over a longer period of time it would eliminate a lot of overhead nee
Matt,
I appreciate the response. What I was trying to do was setup rsync in a
position so that if a network failure came about I can easily kick off
the same rsync command to have it essentially pick-up where it left off.
Having --remove-sent-files is definitely an improvement but if it fails
it
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 14:44 -0400, Matthew Breedlove wrote:
> I was looking through the documentation on –remove-sent-files and it
> seems it will only remove files actually sent across the connection.
> Am I correct in assuming this and is there any patch/method for
> removing synce
I was looking through the documentation on –remove-sent-files
and it seems it will only remove files actually sent across the
connection. Am I correct in assuming this and is there any patch/method
for removing synced files from the source regardless of whether they were
necessary to
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:41:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent
> file just after completing the single file transfer?
Having the --remove-sent-files option make the sender remove files as
soon as it has se
Hi all,
wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent file
just after completing the single file transfer?
Thus one could transfer files that could be processed by the receiver and
there get moved or deleted avter processing.
With large directories and e.g. wireless conn
14 matches
Mail list logo
