I agree that rsync being stateless is a good thing. I have found it very
reliable and predictable for years. I certainly wouldn't change to unison
(which apparently is currently not maintained) just to speed up the file
list transfer.
Delta-transfer of the file list seems to make good sense for
Thanks for that. Doesn't the delta-transfer algorithm compare the files
on sender and receiver? For the file list, we would only need compare the
new file list with the last one on the sender (it would be a simple matter
to check that the receiver's file list is still valid with a checksum).
If
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:21:25PM -0500, Stephen Zemlicka wrote:
> I thought it was supposed to do it more effeciently
Yes, protocol 30 has several improvements that reduce the number of
bytes sent over the wire in addition to its incremental recursion mode.
The latter is slightly less byte-effic
On 10/2/07, Peter Salameh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for that. Doesn't the delta-transfer algorithm compare the files
> on sender and receiver?
Correct.
> For the file list, we would only need compare the
> new file list with the last one on the sender
Unison ( http://www.cis.upenn.edu
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought it was supposed to do it more effeciently
Not that I know of. (Wayne, please correct me if necessary.)
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.ca
, October 01, 2007 8:10 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: Peter Salameh; rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: reducing file list bytes transferred
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the next release is supposed to speed this up.
Are you thinking of incremental recur
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the next release is supposed to speed this up.
Are you thinking of incremental recursion? It interleaves file list
and file data transmission but does not decrease the total amount of
file-list data sent.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe o
, October 01, 2007 5:42 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: reducing file list bytes transferred
Hello,
This is my first posting to the rsync list. I mirror a database
containing directories which contain a very large number of files (say
30,000), and sending the file list can often take longer
On 10/1/07, Peter Salameh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the rsync team considered an rsync option which would remember the
> last file list on both ends, and only send changes to the list?
Perhaps a more natural approach is to use the delta-transfer algorithm
to send the file list. Jamie Lokie
Hello,
This is my first posting to the rsync list. I mirror a database
containing directories which contain a very large number of files (say
30,000), and sending the file list can often take longer than transferring
the new files.(Rsync ends up sending nearly the same file list on
every tran
10 matches
Mail list logo
