> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 09:19
> > To: RSync List (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: question on switches and their order
> >
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 09:19
> To: RSync List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: question on switches and their order
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, it should work fine (with
> impro
rsync -avW --exclude=.snapshot /mail-data/ /mnt
Cheers
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 09:19
To: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: question on switches and their order
So, if I understand you correctly, it should work fine
down by about 60%. The CPU's simply cannot keep up with the LAN. The
> other switch you should use is -W. It deals with whole files and is
> significantly quicker.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
ct: question on switches and their order
Does it matter what order the options/switches are placed? I ask
because I did an initial rsync of data from a NetApp to a SAN box using
the following:
rsync -avz --exclude=.snapshot /mail-data/ /mnt
The .snapshot directory is only useful to Ontap in this in
Does it matter what order the options/switches are placed? I ask
because I did an initial rsync of data from a NetApp to a SAN box using
the following:
rsync -avz --exclude=.snapshot /mail-data/ /mnt
The .snapshot directory is only useful to Ontap in this instance so I
did not want it transfere
