On 8/1/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> > Where is the log file located, I couldn't find any after searching the
> > entire cygwin installation for "*rsync*".
>
> That depends on how you have it configured. By defa
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> Where is the log file located, I couldn't find any after searching the
> entire cygwin installation for "*rsync*".
That depends on how you have it configured. By default, it uses syslog,
so you'd probably want to add a "log file
On 8/1/05, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 06:28:03PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> > I thought if a daemon is already running on the default port, I
> > thought the additional ones started on the same port will result
> > in an exit with error
>
> It certain
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 06:28:03PM -0700, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
> I thought if a daemon is already running on the default port, I
> thought the additional ones started on the same port will result
> in an exit with error
It certainly works that way on all the Unix-like OSes I know. The
error i
On 7/31/05, alok barnwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hari,
> Your observations is very true.
> And you cannot have 2 processess running on same port.
> Such problem is being faced when you try to restart
> particular service and found that previous instance is
> not properly stopped and hence p
I thought if a daemon is already running on the default port, I
thought the additional ones started on the same port will result in an
exit with error, but somehow it seems to work just fine. If I kill the
first process, the second process seems to take control of the port.
As far as I know you can
