Re: measuring 2.6.1 improvements

2004-04-29 Thread John Van Essen
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Eric Whiting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was watching the memory usage with a bash command line while loop > while(true);do cat /proc/$pid/status |grep VmSize ;sleep 60;done > > My last runs I changed the sleep to 5 at the end to get finer resolution on the > memory jump

SV: measuring 2.6.1 improvements

2004-04-27 Thread Tevfik Karagulle
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne av Wayne Davison Sendt: 27. april 2004 23:50 Til: Eric Whiting Kopi: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: measuring 2.6.1 improvements On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:14:10PM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote: > I was watching the memory usage with a bash command line while loop > while(true);

Re: measuring 2.6.1 improvements

2004-04-27 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:14:10PM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote: > I was watching the memory usage with a bash command line while loop > while(true);do cat /proc/$pid/status |grep VmSize ;sleep 60;done A very nice way to do that. You might want to watch the VmRSS value, which will tell you how much

Re: measuring 2.6.1 improvements

2004-04-27 Thread Eric Whiting
Wayne Davison wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:52:11AM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote: > > ... but here is some representative data: > > Thanks for the confirming stats. Some questions/comments: > > You didn't mention what command you ran, so I'm curious if the 18M jump > at the end was due to

Re: measuring 2.6.1 improvements

2004-04-27 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:52:11AM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote: > ... but here is some representative data: Thanks for the confirming stats. Some questions/comments: You didn't mention what command you ran, so I'm curious if the 18M jump at the end was due to using --delete-after? (The way the de