On Mon 30 May 2005, dtra wrote:
>
> ok i did all as suggested, and tried
> rsync -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]::rsync_module/ /path/to/bak/
> and
> rsync -a --password-file=/path/to/pwfile [EMAIL PROTECTED]::rsync_module/
> /path/to/bak/
>
> but it says @ERROR: access denied to rsync_module from unknown
On Fri 27 May 2005, dtra wrote:
when i try this, it says unable to find rsyncd.conf
nice -n 19 rsync -a --rsh="ssh -l remoteuser -c blowfish"
rsyncuser example.com::rsync_module/files /path/to//bak//
Wayne's point of saying "use a daemon" (to paraphrase a bit :-)
is to eliminate use of ssh.
On Fri 27 May 2005, dtra wrote:
> when i try this, it says unable to find rsyncd.conf
> nice -n 19 rsync -a --rsh="ssh -l remoteuser -c blowfish"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]::rsync_module/files /path/to/bak/
Wayne's point of saying "use a daemon" (to paraphrase a bit :-)
is to eliminate use of ssh. By e
No daemon required when using ssh. So you would specify the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/webserver /path/to/bak/
(the --rsh parameter you specified is afaik correct)
- Joost
On Friday 27 May 2005 07:27, dtra wrote:
> sorry, you're prolly tired of me by now
> when i try this, it says unab
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:16:03PM +1000, dtra wrote:
yes, i'm using a the daemon on the host
the rsync call is
nice -n 19 rsync -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/vhosts/site
/path/to/bak/
That call does not make use of a daemon -- that would require :: instead
of :
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:16:03PM +1000, dtra wrote:
> yes, i'm using a the daemon on the host
> the rsync call is
> nice -n 19 rsync -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/vhosts/site
> /path/to/bak/
That call does not make use of a daemon -- that would require :: instead
of : (and an appropriate module
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +1000, dtra wrote:
does running the daemon with nice affect the receiving server?
cos that's where the main problems lie
Obviously, using nice on the daemon affects just the daemon (if you're
using a daemon -- you still didn't sa
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:06:24PM +1000, dtra wrote:
> does running the daemon with nice affect the receiving server?
> cos that's where the main problems lie
Obviously, using nice on the daemon affects just the daemon (if you're
using a daemon -- you still didn't say for sure). So, I have no id
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:52:41AM +1000, dtra wrote:
the cron job uses nice -19 rsync
[...]
sorry, one more thing, on the server we are getting the files from,
max connections is set to 1
Are you connecting to an rsync daemon or not?
If you are running a daemon,
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:52:41AM +1000, dtra wrote:
> the cron job uses nice -19 rsync
> [...]
> sorry, one more thing, on the server we are getting the files from,
> max connections is set to 1
Are you connecting to an rsync daemon or not?
If you are running a daemon, run the *daemon* as "nice
I would suggest that your script that calls the various rsync commands creates
a lockfile and whatever script that is spawning off the additional rsync
processes waits until this lockfile is gone before doing anything.
Ray
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:52:41AM +1000, dtra wrote:
> dtra wrote:
>
> >
dtra wrote:
> hi all
>
> we're using rsync to backup our web server at the moment using it in a
> cron job
> the server we are using to receive all the sync files is a live but
> not heavily used linux machine
> but rsync still takes up more resources than we want it to
> it takes up to 95% (flu
Andrew Gideon wrote:
dtra wrote:
but rsync still takes up more resources than we want it to
it takes up to 95% (fluctuating) cpu load and a fair bit of memory too
the cron job uses nice -19 rsync
but that doesn't seem to do anything, is there anyway to make it use
like 5% cpu or something?
dtra wrote:
> but rsync still takes up more resources than we want it to
> it takes up to 95% (fluctuating) cpu load and a fair bit of memory too
>
> the cron job uses nice -19 rsync
> but that doesn't seem to do anything, is there anyway to make it use
> like 5% cpu or something?
If the other u
I would suggest that your script that calls the various rsync commands creates
a lockfile and whatever script that is spawning off the additional rsync
processes waits until this lockfile is gone before doing anything.
Ray
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:52:41AM +1000, dtra wrote:
> dtra wrote:
>
> >
dtra wrote:
hi all
we're using rsync to backup our web server at the moment using it in a
cron job
the server we are using to receive all the sync files is a live but
not heavily used linux machine
but rsync still takes up more resources than we want it to
it takes up to 95% (fluctuating) cp
hi all
we're using rsync to backup our web server at the moment using it in a
cron job
the server we are using to receive all the sync files is a live but not
heavily used linux machine
but rsync still takes up more resources than we want it to
it takes up to 95% (fluctuating) cpu load and a f
17 matches
Mail list logo
