filename too long...

2008-06-16 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
Hello! Looks like a bug rsync: recv_generator: failed to stat "/home/samba/docs/povalihin/Повалихин/2000-2006/ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ/Дипломные работы/Выбор оптимальных темпов отбора скважинной продукции на основе опыта эксплуатации по горизонтальным скважинам и скважин с БГС Котовского месторождения.doc": F

filename too long problem

2008-06-12 Thread Eric S. Johansson
running rsnapshot for backing up Windows PCs, I'm getting an error message that looks like: rsync: readlink "/Administrator/My Documents/MIT OpenCourseware/DiscreteTimeSignalProcessing/6-341Fall-2005/6-341Fall-2005/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer-Science/6-341Fall-2005/244BA331

Re: Filename too long

2006-05-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:22:37PM +0530, E.Sriram wrote: > Has this issue been fixed in the latest version. Nope. To fix this would require some extensive changes to the receiving side's file handling. And since most systems allow filenames to be 4096 characters long (and thus don't run into th

Re: Filename too long

2006-05-10 Thread E . Sriram
ists.samba.org > Subject: Filename too long > > > This is the rsync version I am using. > > rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 > Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others > <http://rsync.samba.org/> > Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard lin

RE: Filename too long

2006-04-27 Thread Tony
to upgrade. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > E.Sriram > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:55 AM > To: rsync@lists.samba.org > Subject: Filename too long > > > This is the rsync version I am using. > > rsync

Filename too long

2006-04-27 Thread E . Sriram
This is the rsync version I am using. rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums

Re: Tired of "filename too long"? Me too...

2003-08-25 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:01:31AM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote: > I assume there's some good reason for the way filenames are faithfully > maintained as temp files, but it's a little frustrating when you get > "filename too long" messages as a result... with no ind

Tired of "filename too long"? Me too...

2003-08-25 Thread Peter da Silva
I assume there's some good reason for the way filenames are faithfully maintained as temp files, but it's a little frustrating when you get "filename too long" messages as a result... with no indication of what file it was it's complaining about. The obvious fix is to