[Bug 11909] Doc patch for INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES

2020-07-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 11909] New: Doc patch for INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES

2016-05-07 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909 Bug ID: 11909 Summary: Doc patch for INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Manpage states "-C" is an exclude pattern when it's actually a filter rule

2012-01-29 Thread Patrice Peterson
the link to the pastebin with the pattern file and the rsync invocation I used, just in case: https://gist.github.com/1700223 On IRC I was told that -C is actually a filter rule, not an include/exclude pattern, so I should use it with "--filter=merge filterfile", which worked. The manpage layo

exclude pattern matching rule

2010-06-05 Thread Tom Sparks
this is my file layout how do I write a exclusion pattern matching rule for this? TV_show/ NCIS/ NCIS_LA/ Season 01/ [s01x01].ogv [s01x02].ogv tom_a_sparks -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailin

Re: Include/Exclude Pattern for rsync ONLY the latest file of the src dir

2008-10-28 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:58 +0100, Stefan Mosleitner wrote: > Is it possible to selcect a particular source directory and filter/select > ONLY the latest file in this directory for rsync? Selection of the latest file is not built into rsync, but it can be scripted easily: rsync OPTION... SRC/"$(l

Include/Exclude Pattern for rsync ONLY the latest file of the src dir

2008-10-28 Thread Stefan Mosleitner
Hi, Is it possible to selcect a particular source directory and filter/select ONLY the latest file in this directory for rsync? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before p

Re: INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES problem on MAC OS

2008-09-27 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Matt McCutchen wrote: (since rsync does a binary comparison). rsync as well as the Unix kernel, typically. I have implemented i18n support in several programs before, I am working on a draft for BiDi text editing, and I had to look up what decomposition means. If that's the case, I doubt we

Re: INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES problem on MAC OS

2008-09-25 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:12 +0200, mathias lambeau wrote: > I would like to back up several desktop computer, and notebooks who > are running under Mac OS, on a linux server with ext3 filesystem. > > I try several times with rsync, using include lists > ( --include-from=my_include_file). > The inc

INCLUDE/EXCLUDE PATTERN RULES problem on MAC OS

2008-09-25 Thread mathias lambeau
Bonjour, I would like to back up several desktop computer, and notebooks who are running under Mac OS, on a linux server with ext3 filesystem. I try several times with rsync, using include lists ( --include-from=my_include_file). The include list is working except for directory and filename with

Re: unexpected --exclude pattern behaviours with glob wildcards

2003-11-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:28:39PM -0500, Ian! D. Allen wrote: > I see from the CVS log that some of the following awkwardness may be > fixed (or at least different) in the next public release. Yes, there was quite a bit of bug-fixing in this area for the next release. The 2 problems you cited we

unexpected --exclude pattern behaviours with glob wildcards

2003-11-10 Thread Ian! D. Allen
Rsync version: rsync-2.5.6-3mdk (Mandrake 9.2) I see from the CVS log that some of the following awkwardness may be fixed (or at least different) in the next public release. I'm looking forward to that. In the interim, here are some problems: - Problem 1 - unexpected consequence of repl

Re: [rfc idle thought] exclude pattern left anchor

2003-06-05 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:40:24PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > jw schultz wrote: > > A thought has been nagging me for a bit now so i'll run it > > up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes. > > > > There seems to be quite a bit of confusion regarding the use > > of the leading slash as a top of tr

Re: [rfc idle thought] exclude pattern left anchor

2003-06-05 Thread Max Bowsher
jw schultz wrote: > A thought has been nagging me for a bit now so i'll run it > up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes. > > There seems to be quite a bit of confusion regarding the use > of the leading slash as a top of tree anchor for exclude > patterns. The manpage seems clear enough to me b

[rfc idle thought] exclude pattern left anchor

2003-06-04 Thread jw schultz
A thought has been nagging me for a bit now so i'll run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes. There seems to be quite a bit of confusion regarding the use of the leading slash as a top of tree anchor for exclude patterns. The manpage seems clear enough to me but somehow it doesn't seem to

Re: exclude pattern

2003-01-09 Thread Max Bowsher
-- wrote: > Yes, I know that's a newbie question. > > I want to rsync a tree SERVER1:/src/repository to > SERVER2:/otherlocation/repository > with one rsync command. > > Under repository are the directories > foo and > foo/bar/foo > > > Now I want to rsync foo/bar/foo but not foo. > I want to u

exclude pattern

2003-01-09 Thread --
Yes, I know that's a newbie question. I want to rsync a tree SERVER1:/src/repository to SERVER2:/otherlocation/repository with one rsync command. Under repository are the directories foo and foo/bar/foo Now I want to rsync foo/bar/foo but not foo. I want to use the --exclude-from switch (to be