Re: daemon sizes

2007-01-27 Thread Julian Pace Ross
"Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Julian Pace Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:02 PM Subject: Re: daemon sizes On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: I think the best fix is for the receiver to tell t

Re: daemon sizes

2007-01-27 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > I think the best fix is for the receiver to tell the generator how > many bytes it has received in a message just before the second > MSG_DONE; then the generator can correctly print the statistics. I came to the same conclusion and

Re: daemon sizes

2007-01-27 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 1/26/07, Julian Pace Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm still getting strange sizes on the daemon logs. After transferring around 1.66GB over 14 hours (256kbit link) to an absolutely empty directory, I get: 2007/01/26 04:13:43 [26441] sent 57014 bytes received 44708 bytes total size 194722

daemon sizes

2007-01-26 Thread Julian Pace Ross
Hi everyone I'm still getting strange sizes on the daemon logs. After transferring around 1.66GB over 14 hours (256kbit link) to an absolutely empty directory, I get: 2007/01/26 04:13:43 [26441] sent 57014 bytes received 44708 bytes total size 194768 du reports the final size of the dire