On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:12:50PM +1100, Christopher Vance wrote:
> Suppose I have a particular version of a largish compressed archive,
> most likely a .tgz or .tbz2, and that a remote machine has a newer,
> and only slightly different, version of the same archive, where most
> of the content has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:12, Christopher Vance wrote:
> If rsync were to do its file stat and content comparisons on the
> uncompressed copy of both archives, might this not result in less
> network traffic (sending only the small changes) than just looki
Suppose I have a particular version of a largish compressed archive,
most likely a .tgz or .tbz2, and that a remote machine has a newer,
and only slightly different, version of the same archive, where most
of the content hasn't actually changed much. I might attempt to obtain
a copy of the newer a
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:39:23PM +0100, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> Hi there!
> I'm quite happily using rsync.
> There is only one case where I couldn't figure out how to use it
> efficently:
> I sometimes have large compressed files (either .tar.gz or .zip) that
> I need to keep synchronized. The
Hi there!
I'm quite happily using rsync.
There is only one case where I couldn't figure out how to use it
efficently:
I sometimes have large compressed files (either .tar.gz or .zip) that
I need to keep synchronized. The exploded files are usually not
available on the machines i use for rsync (to
