Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:17:51AM +0100, Blickwinkel wrote:
> > Thanks, I was trying your hint with the su command, but somehow
> > "--server" seems to get passed to su and fails:
>
> That is a GNU thing with them reordering options unless POSIXLY_CORRECT
> is set to "1" i
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:17:51AM +0100, Blickwinkel wrote:
> Thanks, I was trying your hint with the su command, but somehow
> "--server" seems to get passed to su and fails:
That is a GNU thing with them reordering options unless POSIXLY_CORRECT
is set to "1" in the environment (which is an ex
Am Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:32:17 -0800 hat Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
geschrieben:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These files have to be rw by wwwrun on the receiver.
As long as your remote-shell logs in as user wwwrun, the files will be
owned by that
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> These files have to be rw by wwwrun on the receiver.
As long as your remote-shell logs in as user wwwrun, the files will be
owned by that user. If you're logging in as root, just run rsync as
that user (e.g. --rsync-path="su -
Hi there,
I'm pushing a directory tree from a samba server with notificytion via
fileschanged (FAM) to a webserver for procession images into an
image-database. These files have to be rw by wwwrun on the receiver.
If the receiver woul pull the files, the script could chmod after transfer,
bu
