On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:14 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> I'm extremely confused about anchoring of patterns for per-directory
> merge files, as what I see seems to not be the behaviour the
> documentation suggests.
>
> On the receiver side I have rsync version 3.0.3 protocol v
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:12:53PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> "-/ tmp/" works though, and does only exclude exactly what I want.
I spoke too soon. For me, "-/ tmp/" works identically to "- tmp/",
that is it excludes everything with a "tmp/" directory in it:
[sender] hiding directory /data/home/a
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:59:29PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:43:33PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > From the manpage:
> >
> >The following modifiers are accepted after a “+” or “-”:
> >
> >o A / specifies that the include/exclude rule should be matched
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:43:33PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> From the manpage:
>
>The following modifiers are accepted after a “+” or “-”:
>
>o A / specifies that the include/exclude rule should be matched
> against the absolute pathname of the current item
On Wed 11 Nov 2009, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> On the sender, I have in the file "/data/home/andy/.rsync-filter":
>
> - /tmp/
>
> The documentation leads me to believe that this should exclude a
> directory called "tmp/" located only in the same directory as the
> merge file. What happens is, nothin
Hi,
I'm extremely confused about anchoring of patterns for per-directory
merge files, as what I see seems to not be the behaviour the
documentation suggests.
On the receiver side I have rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version
30. On the sender I have rsync version 2.6.9 protocol versi
