Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-30 Thread macuserfr
OK, so here I'm giving you the "final" version of the script timestamp.sh working for me: - #!/bin/tcsh #Turn on debug info set DEBUG = 1 #Name of the backup mount (partition) set MOUNTNAME = data #Name of the backup directory set

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-29 Thread macuserfr
I've made a simpler test: freenas:~# cat /var/etc/rsyncd.conf syslog facility = local4 list = no port = 873 pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid uid = rsync [serveuranm] comment = Sauvegarde du serveur ANM path = /mnt/data/serveuranm/ list = true max connections = 0 read only = false uid = serveuranm

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-29 Thread macuserfr
Hello there! Le 28 juil. 08 à 16:24, Matt McCutchen a écrit : (This original message doesn't seem to have gone to the list.) Actually it is here http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg22126.html , but I messed around mail replies. Dunno exactly what I did... Doesn't matter.

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-28 Thread Matt McCutchen
> Le 28 juil. 08 à 09:39, macuserfr a écrit : > > Hi folks, that's me again... > > > > Well, following Matt's suggestion, I'm trying to setup my server to > > call a post transfer script. Guess what? It's not working and I > > don't know why. I've looked around other posts in this mail list and

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-28 Thread macuserfr
Hmmm, I also tried this to use variable from the script calling instead of from the script body, same result (script doesn't run : / ) : freenas:/mnt/data/serveuranm# cat ../timestamp.sh #!/bin/tcsh #Turn on debug info set DEBUG = 0 #Check if we have the good arg number if( $# < 1 || $# > 1

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-19 Thread Mac User FR
Le 19 juil. 08 à 20:13, Matt McCutchen a écrit : On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 15:45 +0200, Mac User FR wrote: In another hand, don't you think we could add the content of this script (revised, of course) to make rsync a complete incremental backup solution without needing 3rd part software? Isn't a

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-19 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 15:45 +0200, Mac User FR wrote: > For rsnapshot, OK, I understood now how to connect them. The "post- > xfer exec" I was looking for don't exist on the rsync man page, but > on the rsyncd.conf which I've didn't look at (my fault :/ ). I think I > will not use rsnapshot b

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-19 Thread Mac User FR
Thanks Matt!! I'm always amazed of the quick and precise answers you give! Yes, sorry, I meant push (English isn't my native langage and I always swap push and pull). For rsnapshot, OK, I understood now how to connect them. The "post- xfer exec" I was looking for don't exist on the rsync ma

Re: Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 12:40 +0200, macuserfr wrote: > What's new? On my new job I have several servers to > administrate. Servers that aren't backed up (sic). So, there's why I'm > back to rsync. > > The backup plan I would like: > > 1) Client side: PCs running rsync (or cwrsync with UTF-8 mo

Yet another rsync incremental thread

2008-07-18 Thread macuserfr
Hello all, Since the rsync on Panther many things changed in my professional life. This project is abandoned although it should work. But this you already know. What's new? On my new job I have several servers to administrate. Servers that aren't backed up (sic). So, there's why I'm back