On 10/08/2017 06:19 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Pavel Kasparek via rsync
> mailto:rsync@lists.samba.org>> wrote:
>
> when the "write only = yes" option is used on rsync server, [...
> would a] hacked client [...] be able to get the list of remote dir [?]
>
>
>
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Pavel Kasparek via rsync <
rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> when the "write only = yes" option is used on rsync server, [... would a]
> hacked client [...] be able to get the list of remote dir [?]
It wouldn't work. The listing action is a special kind of read oper
--list-only (or no target specified) are the only listings without
transferring that rsync supports. The restriction would not apply to
the list of modules (IIRC there is another option for that).
On 09/06/2017 04:00 AM, Pavel Kasparek via rsync wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> when the "write only = yes
Hello all,
when the "write only = yes" option is used on rsync server, the client
can't download any file from the server.
My question is, if in that case the rsync protocol will allow the client
to read the server directory content or not. The question is not about
if standard rsync client will
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 9:15 pm, you wrote:
> I am aware of the possibility of overwriting files in spite of
> write-only option. I could set up the backup system in such a way only
> because I completely trust the users and can be sure, that nobody will
> do anything evil.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> It seems to me that there must be a more fundamental problem with the
> security model of that backup system if users had the ability to read each
> other's files. Even with a "write only" option, they can overwrite each
>
rij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:Re: Write-only option
Classification:
It seems to me that there must be a more fundamental problem with the
security model of that backup system if users had the ability
It seems to me that there must be a more fundamental problem with the
security model of that backup system if users had the ability to read each
other's files. Even with a "write only" option, they can overwrite each
other's files, right? What if somebody overwrite a cruc
Hi!
I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some
time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users
from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've
hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When
se
