Re: Would this patch be useful...

2004-05-14 Thread Chuck Wolber
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:41:02AM -0400, John Taylor wrote: > > I am considering a patch that would exclude compressing a given list > > of file extensions when the -z option is used. > > Well, since the daemon code has this, it makes sense to at least

Re: Would this patch be useful...

2004-05-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:41:02AM -0400, John Taylor wrote: > I am considering a patch that would exclude compressing a given list > of file extensions when the -z option is used. Well, since the daemon code has this, it makes sense to at least consider adding this to the normal remote-shell code

Would this patch be useful...

2004-05-11 Thread John Taylor
I am considering a patch that would exclude compressing a given list of file extensions when the -z option is used. Users may want to use -z, but not want to try to compress .gz, .jpg, .mp3, etc. type files. Rsyncd has this feature with it's "dont compress" option, but I think many users are usin