Andrew Gideon wrote:
> On the other hand, I recall that Oracle has its own replication engine
> for this purpose. As much as I like rsync, wouldn't it make more sense
> to use the Oracle-provided mechanism?
That was my first thought, too. If the OP is already paying for two
Oracle instances, r
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:23:24 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> but the non-atomicity of read(2) calls was not considered
If a frozen snapshot is constructed, then I don't see how read()'s
inatomicity (if that's a word {8^) would matter.
However, I see a related issue.
My experience with DB engine
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:25 -0700, Saibabu Devabhaktuni wrote:
> We currently use rsync to create an Oracle standby on a target box
> from an existing standby by copying all the datafiles while the source
> standby is in recovery status. We are occasionally running into
> datafile corruptions being
Hi,
We currently use rsync to create an Oracle standby on a target box from an
existing standby by copying all the datafiles while the source standby is in
recovery status. We are occasionally running into datafile corruptions being
reported by oracle when it is recovering the new standby. Orac
