On Thu, 2002-10-24 05:06:11 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-10-24 04:04:14 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Thu,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-24 04:04:14 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > I think '--preserve-server-atime' would be a ni
On Thu, 2002-10-24 04:04:14 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > I think '--preserve-server-atime' would be a nice additional feature,
> > and I tend to implement it on monday or so. I ha
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've just tried to do a backup of a machine with rsync. While doing this
> (I was reading emails:-) I noted that mbox for mbox, I had no longe new
> mails, but I've never read off these mailboxes lately... This seemed to
Hi!
I've just tried to do a backup of a machine with rsync. While doing this
(I was reading emails:-) I noted that mbox for mbox, I had no longe new
mails, but I've never read off these mailboxes lately... This seemed to
be a st_atime problem, and indeed, I could verify that. This is what I
used f
