Re: Using rsync 2.3.1, individual file size limitation...

2001-10-17 Thread Michael Salmon
On Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:10:18 PM -0400 Mark Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +-- | | > send_files failed to open .../data1/intlmv.data/histimv.rec: | > Value too large for defined data type | | Is that Solaris 8? I ask not just because you should have mentioned | this in the bug re

Re: Using rsync 2.3.1, individual file size limitation...

2001-10-11 Thread Mark Eichin
> send_files failed to open .../data1/intlmv.data/histimv.rec: > Value too large for defined data type Is that Solaris 8? I ask not just because you should have mentioned this in the bug report (tsk tsk :-) but that I've seen that error and it *didn't* have anything to do with file size (or rsy

Using rsync 2.3.1, individual file size limitation...

2001-10-11 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Wednesday 10 Oct 01, Andre Quintana writes: > Dear Folks, > > Our Company VESTEK have been using "rsync" for the > past 4 months. As of today, it was pointed out that any > file larger then 2,147,483,647kb (to be specific) could not > be rsynced. This 2GB filesize limit depends on the operat

Using rsync 2.3.1, individual file size limitation...

2001-10-10 Thread Andre Quintana
Dear Folks, Our Company VESTEK have been using "rsync" for the past 4 months. As of today, it was pointed out that any file larger then 2,147,483,647kb (to be specific) could not be rsynced. We found too that this message in our com- mon output file showed up: send_files failed to open .../dat