Wayne Davison writes:
> My patch leaves out the IPv6 logic if INET6 is not configured into rsync.
Sounds reasonable.
> I've checked-in the appended patch. See if you like it.
Looks good to me. I'll report to the Debian bug tracking system that
these issues are now fixed in CVS upstream.
T
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:29:58PM +0200, Thorild Selen wrote:
> It's not enough just checking the last char to see whether something
> is an address: [...]
Yeah, good point. I've checked in an improved version of the test based
on your suggestions (which I finally got around to looking at in dep
> Ah yes, I recall thinking that your patch should go in, but I thereafter
> forgot about it. I've gone ahead and committed your change since it was
> very simple and similar to what we used to do in 2.5.5, only with a
> better heuristic. I'm planning to look into Thorild Selen's patch as--text f
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:07:02PM -0500, John Van Essen wrote:
> I had submitted a similar bug report and small patch on April 10:
> There were no followups to it at the time.
Ah yes, I recall thinking that your patch should go in, but I thereafter
forgot about it. I've gone ahead and committed
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Thorild Selen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system:
>
>--
>
>An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as
>addresses. It may
Sorry, I missed that an address should be able to contain a slash
(used with netmask) and a % and some more stuff too if it's a scoped
IPv6 address. Here's a new patch.
Thorild Selén
Datorföreningen Update / Update Computer Club, Uppsala, SE
---
Greetings,
As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system:
--
An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as
addresses. It may contain several patterns to match against.
address_match (in access.c
