Re: Timestanp question

2007-03-30 Thread William D. Tallman
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:02:18PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:18:39PM -0700, William D. Tallman wrote: > > My question is this: do I need to continue to use --size-only, or has > > the first rsync backup run put time stamps on all files? > > You can drop the --size-o

Re: Timestanp question

2007-03-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:18:39PM -0700, William D. Tallman wrote: > My question is this: do I need to continue to use --size-only, or has > the first rsync backup run put time stamps on all files? You can drop the --size-only option after that first use with the -t option, because rsync will ha

Re: Timestanp question

2007-03-30 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 3/30/07, William D. Tallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've now got scripts that correctly backup all my primary partitions to a second drive. The original problem was that I copied them over without a time stamp, so that the first rsync run found no timestamps and wanted to copy them all ove

Timestanp question

2007-03-30 Thread William D. Tallman
I've now got scripts that correctly backup all my primary partitions to a second drive. The original problem was that I copied them over without a time stamp, so that the first rsync run found no timestamps and wanted to copy them all over again. So I used: 'rsync -r -t -v --size-only $