Re: Suspicious sizes by different C compilers

2002-03-19 Thread 'Martin Pool'
On 19 Mar 2002, "Granzow, Doug (NCI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On gcc, rsync builds by default with debug symbols included. If you > >strip both executables, they should end up about the same size. > > > How do you "strip" an executable? Use "make install-strip", or see the manual for y

Re: Suspicious sizes by different C compilers

2002-03-18 Thread Zoong Pham
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:29:45PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > On 19 Mar 2002, Zoong Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is about _7 times_ smaller! > > On gcc, rsync builds by default with debug symbols included. If you > strip both executables, they should end up about the same size. You a

Re: Suspicious sizes by different C compilers

2002-03-18 Thread Martin Pool
On 19 Mar 2002, Zoong Pham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > On my Alpha box running Tru64 5.1, rsync-2.5.4 compiled by GNU gcc > 3.0.1 anh GNU make 3.79.1 has this size: 4562848. > The same version of rsync compiled by Compaq C compiler V6.3-028 and > Compaq make has this size: 655424. > It

Suspicious sizes by different C compilers

2002-03-18 Thread Zoong Pham
Hi all, On my Alpha box running Tru64 5.1, rsync-2.5.4 compiled by GNU gcc 3.0.1 anh GNU make 3.79.1 has this size: 4562848. The same version of rsync compiled by Compaq C compiler V6.3-028 and Compaq make has this size: 655424. It is about _7 times_ smaller! I did a quick test and they seem both