On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:11:52PM -0800, Scott Becker wrote:
> Can rsync be set up with: here's the src dir, here's the remote dir, now
> here's a relative list of files I want you to sync? Perhaps being fed
> one at a time via a pipe.
Rsync supports that, but not on an incremental basis -- i.e
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 06:11 pm, Scott Becker wrote:
> I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring'
> technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful
> of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the
> kenel and it's called inoti
On Wed, 2005-03-02 16:11:52 -0800, Scott Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring'
> technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful
> of directories. The replacement for dnotify is b
Scott wrote:
> of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the
> kenel and it's called inotify. If I understand it correctly
> and they get it finished, it would be an awesome addition to rsync.
I can't speak for the people who work on rsync, but from the sounds of this,
it
I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring'
technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful
of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the
kenel and it's called inotify. If I understand it correctly and they get
it finished, it
