Re: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-17 Thread jw schultz
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:08:43PM -0500, Chris McKeever wrote: > Greger.. > I replaced the rsync.exe with the one from your link, it relieved the > windows CPU some (from 100% to 98% with flucuation to 100%). > > I also took the advice of using the -u switch. From the man: > > -u, --update

RE: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-17 Thread Chris McKeever
; _Chris McKeever_ > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Rsync Performance In Windows > > > Thanks for your reply! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Greger Cronquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 2:42 PM > > To: _Chris McKeev

RE: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Chris McKeever
Thanks for your reply! > -Original Message- > From: Greger Cronquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 2:42 PM > To: _Chris McKeever_ > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Rsync Performance In Windows > > > Did you compile from the s

RE: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread _Chris McKeever_
om: Chris McKeever > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 4:03 PM > To: 'Lapo Luchini'; _Chris McKeever_; rsync > Subject: RE: Rsync Performance In Windows > > > Thanks for your response... > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 &

RE: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Chris McKeever
Thanks for your response... > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > _Chris McKeever_ wrote: > > >The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon > has a very low > >performance hit when the session is running (see below). > However, the > >windows machine, which

Re: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _Chris McKeever_ wrote: >The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low >performance hit when the session is running (see below). However, the >windows machine, which has a much faster CPU hits a CPU usage of 100%. > rsync CPU

Re: Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread Greger Cronquist
Did you compile from the sources, or did you grab the cygwin binary? I suggest you build it from the sources and apply the "craigb-perf.diff" patch which is in the patches directory in the 2.5.6 distribution. This patch makes all the difference for Windows (system calls cost a lot under cygwin)

Rsync Performance In Windows

2003-06-16 Thread _Chris McKeever_
Has anyone else experienced high CPU usage when using RSYNC in windows 2000 server? I am using the rsync.exe (and applicable DLL's) from the cygwin installation (I am not however running cygwin on this machine). The linux machine connecting to the windows rsync daemon has a very low performance h