Bruce there is also bacula which seems to be available for all the os's you
are running.
http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=documentation
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:24 PM, wrote:
>
> Well the local test was just to a test to see if I could understand why
> the remote sync of the exchange database
Well the local test was just to a test to see if I could understand why
the remote sync of the exchange database was so slow. I've heard that
rsync is less efficient for local copies but this isn't like 80% the
performance, or half the performance.. It's a massive difference - which
I wasn't
Clean copy. I even used the -W flag to see if it made a difference but,
nope.
I'm testing this same test on some of my other servers too. See if
there's any common-ground I can find.
On another servers (MS SQL Server) with faster disks I tried a similar
test just now. There's only the C dr
-- Original Message --
From: "Kevin Korb"
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Sent: 2/10/2014 10:57:08 AM
Subject: Re: Rsync performance with large exchange database files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3.1.0 will probably help some.
What are the specs of the FreeBSD system? I
