Re: timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread zhijiang tian
I actually have to use rsync-2.5.7-5.3E which is included in RHEL3. I assume that the problem with the aging timestamps results in more files are transferred... I've no idea why the source timestamps are changed... Can anyone explain this?? Or does anyone has an idea why it could happen? Juergen

Re: timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread Juergen Busam
I actually have to use rsync-2.5.7-5.3E which is included in RHEL3. I assume that the problem with the aging timestamps results in more files are transferred... I've no idea why the source timestamps are changed... Can anyone explain this?? Or does anyone has an idea why it could happen? Juergen

Re: timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:24:50PM +1000, Juergen Busam wrote: > how is it possible that the files age a few hours on the source? If you're running at least 2.6.4, use the -i option to see a summary of what differences rsync sees between the pairs of files. For instance, a summary like this: >f.

Re: timestamps

2005-05-25 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 25 May 2005, Juergen Busam wrote: > > I'm syncing a windows share from a NetApp filer to a local partition on > my RHEL3 box. I observe the following behavior: > > - rsync syncs more than neccessary, files that haven't changed since years > - files that have been synced, aged for an hour o