On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 08:06:36AM -0600, Tim Conway wrote:
> If the samba share is a bottleneck, I'd bet you'd get a big boost by
> using the --whole-file option...
Yes, or better yet moving the receiving rsync onto the machine that is
actually storing the data. This is the only way that rsync c
no.
it creates the temporary file, then deletes the old file and renames the
temp file to the correct filename. Unless samba won't let you rename a
file, (I know windows moves within a filesystem are copy/deletes, at least
with cygwin on windows 2000), there's no actual waste there. I'd expect
