On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 6:13 AM Paul Slootman wrote:
> IMHO rsync is correct in refusing to run with a missing rsyncd.conf.
>
Yeah, it's one of the ways that some installs prevent a superfluous daemon
from starting up -- if it's not configured, you don't want it.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-a
On Sat 17 Sep 2022, Colton Lewis via rsync wrote:
> This is on a system where /etc/rsyncd.conf does not exist and goes away if
> /etc/rsyncd.conf is an empty file.
>
> Version: rsync version 3.2.5 protocol version 31
> Command: rsync --daemon
> What happens: The program outputs "Failed to pars
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 7:17 AM Chandrasekar Natarajan wrote:
> Kindly help me to resolve this.
>
One thing you can do is to change the initial command from "rsync" to
"/usr/bin/rsync" (if that is where the real command is installed in your
setup) in order to try to avoid any script & shell alias
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for your reply.
This is the command I am using now(a simple command) *rsync -vrcz --port
u...@x.x.x.xx::Module1 '/cygdrive/d/test 123/'*
This is the exception 'Unexpected remote arg: User@x.x.x.x::Module1
rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1361) [sender=3.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:02 PM Chandrasekar Natarajan wrote:
> Unexpected remote arg: user@x.x.x.x:port/module
>
This means that your non-option args starts with a local arg, contains a
remote arg somewhere in the middle, and ends with either a local or remote
arg. None of those are valid becau
Hi,
Even I tried the same syntax but failed. But push is working fine. rsync:
Unexpected remote arg: user@x.x.x.x::module.
> On 26-Jun-2020, at 5:22 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:
>
> user@x.x.x.x:port/ModuleName is not correct syntax. You may have
> something in your shell config translating that
user@x.x.x.x:port/ModuleName is not correct syntax. You may have
something in your shell config translating that for you. Correct syntax
is --port and user@host::module
On 6/25/20 6:01 PM, Chandrasekar Natarajan via rsync wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to pull folders from a windows remote m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You can do that with rsync over ssh but not rsyncd.
On 09/21/2015 10:57 AM, Simon Wong (Staff) wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Can someone let me know if it is possible to setup an Rsync server
> with domain authenticated users e.g. Active Directory users rat
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sat 06 Mar 2010, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> > > runs?
> >
> > No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think i
On Sat 06 Mar 2010, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> > runs?
>
> No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think it
> would be simple to add, but if
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
> Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> runs?
No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think it
would be simple to add, but if someone wants to work on patch, I'd consider
adding it
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Daniel.Li wrote:
> b) Moniter CPU and mem usage during backup;
Yes, you are right. CPU% as given by ps aux seems always very low. Only a few %.
> I think you can test the system to find out what is the bottleneck.
Trying that now.
> I run a daemon on my Nasbox
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 22:39 -0500, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> > If you're not using different partitions on different disks, then
> doing
> > anything in parallel is probably going to slow it down
> (reading/writing
> > all over the disk, means more seektime, which means waiting).
>
> No, its just a sin
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Leen Besselink wrote:
> I think Daniel was trying to say, cpu might not be the bottleneck, it could
> be network or something else (I doubt it's memory rsync 3 pretty much solved
> that for most) and if you ask me it's probably disk.
Ah! I see. Thanks for the clarif
Rahul Nabar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Daniel.Li wrote:
>
>> I think multi-client can improve performance, but limit is the same as
>> above.
>
> I don't think I understand! Can I start more than one "rsync --daemon"
> instances then?
>
>
>> What kind of performance you are conce
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Daniel.Li wrote:
> I think multi-client can improve performance, but limit is the same as
> above.
I don't think I understand! Can I start more than one "rsync --daemon"
instances then?
> What kind of performance you are concerning, network/cpu/ram/disk
> IO ...
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 20:57 -0500, Rahul Nabar wrote:
> Is there a way to speed up rsync by opening more than one daemon in
> parallel.
daemon will create a process when a connection is established. So the
limit is hardware.
> I use rsync --daemon to start rsync. I was wondering if
> opening m
Matt McCutchen escribió:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:02 -0300, Alejandro Celery wrote:
I have a problem: I was running rsync --daemon on a Ubuntu 6.10 linux
without problems. I used it to sync our company intranet from a Windows
host through deltacopy. Then I migrated my system to new hardware
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:02 -0300, Alejandro Celery wrote:
> I have a problem: I was running rsync --daemon on a Ubuntu 6.10 linux
> without problems. I used it to sync our company intranet from a Windows
> host through deltacopy. Then I migrated my system to new hardware and
> installed Ubuntu
On Tue 25 Mar 2008, Ming Zhang wrote:
>
> Tried to search the list but could not find anything about this.
>
> I have a rsync daemon running with starting cwd as /usr/local/bin. then
> after some io, and after all io finished, its cwd is /fs1 which is one
> of the module path. now i need to umoun
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:30:55PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The current development rsync ignores all errors, but errors other
> than ENOSYS might be significant.
Yeah, good idea. I've changed the dev version to only ignore ENOSYS.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://li
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 22:20 +0100, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> I don't how to really fix into rsync,
> except checking uname to get the running kernel's version.
It would seem much more direct to simply attempt the lutimes and ignore
an error of ENOSYS (Function not implemented). I don't think it's
Le lundi 10 décembre 2007, Matt McCutchen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > It seems that people running the Debian 2.6.9-5.1 version which has this
> > patch applied. are running into problems where rsync wants to set
> > permissions on symlinks.
>
> In the re
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> It seems that people running the Debian 2.6.9-5.1 version which has this
> patch applied. are running into problems where rsync wants to set
> permissions on symlinks.
In the report rsync seems to want to set mtimes, not permissions.
> The
On Tue 27 Nov 2007, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> Starting with the 3.0.0-pre6 release, there will be a new daemon option
> available: "munge symlinks". This will allow an rsync daemon to accept
> symlinks and return them intact (with even a leading slash still there,
> which is new for a non-chroot d
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:41:27PM -0500, chuang liu wrote:
> > I already have "port=5550" in the rsyncd.conf. It looks like I still need
> > to add "--port=5550" in the command line. Is this a known issue with rsync
> > or do I miss anything? I am run
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:41:27PM -0500, chuang liu wrote:
> I already have "port=5550" in the rsyncd.conf. It looks like I still need
> to add "--port=5550" in the command line. Is this a known issue with rsync
> or do I miss anything? I am running rsync version 2.6.3.
The "port" and "address" d
On 9/18/07, chuang liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This command returns without any error although the daemon does not get
> started.
Anything in /var/log/messages ? Try invoking the daemon with --no-detach.
-A
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
It rans after I added --port in the command line as follows:
> rsync -v -v --daemon --config=rsyncd.conf --port=5550
I already have "port=5550" in the rsyncd.conf. It looks like I still need
to add "--port=5550" in the command line. Is this a known issue with rsync
or do I miss anything? I am run
On Wed 18 Apr 2007, Peter van Leuven wrote:
>
> [test]
> path = /home/user/test
> comment = rsync test
> use chroot = yes
> gid = nobody
> uid = nobody
> read only = no
> list = yes
> auth users = user
> secrets file = /etc/rs
On Fri 05 Dec 2003, Bill Geddes wrote:
> I have been using rsync in daemon mode to get backups of systems. The
> daemon would not start on one system. Gave the syslog message that
> the 'Address already in use'. netstat, lsof, ps - nothing exposed the
> process that was taking the port. It wou
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:35:09PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> If the rsyncd.conf has a line such as:
>
> log file = /var/log/rsync/log
>
> and /var/log/rsync doesn't exist or isn't a directory (or the log file
> can't be opened for any other reason), then there's no warning
> whatsoever, as rs
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:04:53PM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:49:36 -0400
> > Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > IMHO, it would enhance user understanding to provide a
> > > concrete EXAMPLE of this. Also, it would
I'll include the attachment this time...
Hardy Merrill
.TH "rsyncd\&.conf" "5" "26 Jan 2003" "" ""
.SH "NAME"
rsyncd\&.conf \- configuration file for rsync server
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
.PP
rsyncd\&.conf
.PP
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.PP
The rsyncd\&.conf file is the runtime configuration file for rsync wh
Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:49:36 -0400
> Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, it would enhance user understanding to provide a
> > concrete EXAMPLE of this. Also, it would help in
> > 'man rsyncd.conf' not only to see an example of an
> > rsyncd.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:49:36 -0400
Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rsync -avv [EMAIL PROTECTED]::test-secret/one_secret
> /tmp/rsync_test_secret
Yes, that's better.
> Although 'man rsync' does "technically" describe this
> in the CONNECTING TO AN RSYNC SERVER OVER A REMOTE SHELL
>
After seeing another question answered today on the
same 'rsyncd.secrets' topic, I solved my problem -
I had more than one:
1. in the /etc/rsyncd.conf file, I specified
secrets file = /etc/rsync.secrets
when the proper file was 'rsyncd.secrets'
2. the one and only line I have in /
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:15:23PM -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
>
> I have two computers: a Linux box which I use as my workstation
> (day-to-day use) and an OpenBSD box which I designate for server tasks:
> gateway, firewall, etc.
>
> I use rsync to mirror many gigs worth of data from the Linux box
Just did a successful rsync -- problem was with reiser filesystem.
Moved all files off the raid, ran reiserfsck with --rebuild-tree (fix-fixable
was not enough), ran rsync after rebuild finished -- no problems.
There were a number of files that the rebuild-tree found that weren't attached
E
After switching much hardware (and getting some helpful suggestions) I moved
the specific machine's files on the backup server to a hard drive outside
the raid (still on the backup server, /dev/hdi1) and tried rsync -- problem
solved.
It seems there's a problem with the journaled filesystems (
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:25:57PM -0600, Edward King wrote:
> Has anyone seen this? Looking for past experiences / ideas. Will post
> progress.
>
> I'm tracking down a problem that seems to be caused by rsync. When
> moving files from a remote server I get a kernel panic.
>
> We have a numb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Linux, running 'rsync --daemon' as root bypasses some security
> restrictions, allowing access to otherwise inaccessible files.
Well, I can see why you think this is confusing, but I think rsync's
behaviour is reasonable and consistent with Unix's security design.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Giorgos Chatzilias wrote:
> Dear all,
> I would like please to ask how a client side rsync command is syntaxed.
> The daemon runs at port 2000 (--port=2000)
> and the rsyncd.conf is:
>
> [modulename]
> path = /usr/tmp/lala
> auth users = g
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:10:46AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> I noticed this same problem on my redhat 6.2 machine last week. Check
> /var/adm/messages. Mine reported
>
> inetd[415]: rsync/tcp server failing (looping or being flooded), service
>terminated for 10 min
>
> I could see no w
> From: Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:10:46 -0600
> Subject: Re: rsync daemon
>
> I noticed this same problem on my redhat 6.2 machine last week. Check
> /var/adm/messages. Mine reported
>
> inetd[415]: rsync/tcp server fai
Subject: Re: rsync daemon
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:10:46 -0600
>
> I noticed this same problem on my redhat 6.2 machine last week. Check
> /var/adm/messages. Mine reported
>
> inetd[415]: rsync/tcp server failing (looping or being flooded), service
>terminated for
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 04:39:32PM +1100, Ian Millsom wrote:
> > What's your version of rsync? What's your OS, both client and server?
> > Please post replies to the list.
>
> Sorry forgot to mention, all servers running redhat 6.2 rsync version
> 2.4.1 on all machines
>
> Just after this posti
> What's your version of rsync? What's your OS, both client and server?
> Please post replies to the list.
Sorry forgot to mention, all servers running redhat 6.2 rsync version =
2.4.1 on all machines
Just after this posting, I had checked my version, to the current one on
the site, and noticed
48 matches
Mail list logo
