As an example, I transfered 1930420 KBytes with rsync between two 2.8 GHz Intel
P4 machines over gigabit ethernet and got this:
transfer method:ssh rshnfs rsync
wall time in sec 130.01 79.77 176.03 74.92
MBit/sec116 189 86201
Mind you, this is no benchmark as I
> > How do you call rsync?
>
> rsync -av --delete --perms --acls ...
You left out the rest. Specifically, what protocol
are you using over the ethernet? Are you using an
rsync server, ssh, NFS, SMB, or what? A straight
rsync server is by far the fastest, I've found. So
you'd do something lik
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao F
> ask rsync to be slower ?!?
>
> How do you call rsync?
rsync -av --delete --perms --acls ...
> Do you use zipping?
I don't explicitlly ask for it ?
What's the default behaviour ? to use zipping or
For situations where it's all new files, using -W would make it a lot
more efficient and less CPU intensive.
You can ask rsync to be slower with it's built in bandwidth limiting
options.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:14:02PM +0100, Joao Ferreira wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabia
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I'm experiencing about 20MBit/s on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when
> >rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files.
> >
> >I don't have much exeprience with rsync.
At 10:37 22.04.2008 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I'm experiencing about 20MBit/s on a 100MBit/s ethernet connection when
>rsync'ing a lager number on _new_ files.
>
>I don't have much exeprience with rsync. I'dd just like to know if thi
>is an acceptable bw usage and what could
