Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-19 Thread gigagigosu
Both 10.4.x servers (rsync client and server) are bound to AD and permissions on these folders are assigned based on AD users or groups. When i checked again this am, i noticed that permissions and ACLs did propagate properly... don't know what changed but seems fine now... Thank you for your ti

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-18 Thread Mike Bombich
Are the users specified in the ACE present in the directory service on the remote machine? If not, you'll see errors like this. ACLs are set using the username, not uid, so matching user accounts must be present on the remote machine Mike On May 14, 2009, at 7:02 PM, gigagigosu wrote:

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-14 Thread gigagigosu
sorry, i forgot to mention that both client and server are running MacOS 10.4 (client is 10.4.8 and server is 10.4.11) and both source and destination are HFS+ Journaled, both machines are G5 PowerPC xserves. Partition scheme on both source volume and destination volume is Apple Partition Map. Al

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-14 Thread David C. Miller
to preserve Mac OS X ACL's and extended attributes you have to be rsyncing to another Mac or at least a volume formatted with HFS+. If your rsync server is not a Mac and the HFS+ partition does not have ACL's turned on then the ACL's and extended attributes won't be copied. David. - Origi