On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:42:55AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> What is a typical value for "len-total"?
The most typical value is "4". Once a file starts to transfer, values
are typically several K (I've seen up to 32K, but only on larger files).
I had been thinking that a better algorithm for
On Mon 24 May 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> output. Finally, I applied a modified version of the patch that Paul
> just reminded us that Debian is using, though I decided to limit the
> write size to "bwlimit * 512" rather than "bwlimit * 100" (at least for
> now, but feel free to argue that a dif
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:54:42PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I'm looking into some of the old bwlimit patches to see about
> improving this.
Here's a potential patch to make --bwlimit better. This started with
Roger's idea on accumulating delay until we have enough to make a sleep
call withou
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> I can repeat this time after time. If --bwlimit is > 4000 (ie. 4005,
> 4025, 4050,5000,7500,1,10) real is in the same range as 4001.
> If --bwlimit is 4000 or under (ie. 3725, 2000, 1000, 100) real is in
> the same range as
On Fri 21 May 2004, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> Since --bwlimit depends upon sleep(1 second), I repeated the experiment with a file
> that was 383 Megabyte so that when I am running unthrottled it takes significantly
> longer than a second (ie. ~50 seconds) to complete. I get the same bi-modal beh
Since --bwlimit depends upon sleep(1 second), I repeated the experiment with a file
that was 383 Megabyte so that when I am running unthrottled it takes significantly
longer than a second (ie. ~50 seconds) to complete. I get the same bi-modal behavior
but with different values for 4000 and 4001
