[Wayne Davison]
> That patch was included in the 2.6.3pre1 release (though a small
> portion of it proved to be unneeded and was not applied). See the
> rsync.samba.org web site for the source (and there's a debian release
> in experimental which has a version of 2.6.2.pre3.1-1 because the
> offi
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 11:55:01AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Thank you. I noticed your patch on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09671.html>,
> but it seem to be missing in version 2.6.2. When do you plan to
> include it in the official source?
That patch was included
[Wayne Davison, 2004-02-25]
> Unfortunately, that patch is too simplistic -- e.g. it doesn't handle
> the case where the file had to be copied into place. I'll try to come
> up with a better patch, but I do want to be sure we think though any
> repercussions before I commit a change like this.
T
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:47:56PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Any hopes of getting this patch included into rsync? The problem is
> still present in rsync 2.6.0.
Unfortunately, that patch is too simplistic -- e.g. it doesn't handle
the case where the file had to be copied into place. I'
Any hopes of getting this patch included into rsync? The problem is
still present in rsync 2.6.0.
[Petter Reinholdtsen, 2003-05-20]
> There is a small race condition in rsync 2.5.6. When the transfer
> is finished, and the file is moved into place, there is a short time
> period where the new f
