Re: library access to rsync protocol

2001-02-14 Thread Martin Pool
On 13 Feb 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:19:38PM -0800, Phillip Moore wrote: > > I've been a real big proponent of rsync here and I've used it all over > > the place to rip the use of NFS out of production. I've even gone so > > far as to have an rexec

Re: library access to rsync protocol

2001-02-13 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:19:38PM -0800, Phillip Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:06:29PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: .. > > What exactly did you want to do with the library? > > > I've been a real big proponent of rsync here and I've used it all over > the place to rip the use of NFS o

Re: library access to rsync protocol

2001-02-13 Thread Phillip Moore
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:06:29PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > It hasn't been done, and it's not a good idea because the protocol that the > rsync program uses is not intended to be general or have more than one > implementation. It is highly optimized for the one application. There are > ev

Re: library access to rsync protocol

2001-02-13 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:01:31AM -0800, Phillip Moore wrote: > I want to write a library that can directly contact an rsyncd server without > using the rsync client program. Does anyone know of something else that has > been written to use the rsync protocol or has someone already done this