While this does appear to work in 2.5.4, I suspect that is because
of the 2.5.4 whole-file bug.
With 2.5.5 it fails again, with the following error message:
deflate on token returned 0 (16384 bytes left)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(288)
According to sba
I did one quick test with an unmodified rsync-2.5.4, and it seems to have fixed
this problem. However, someone else should verify this.
According to Dave Dykstra:
> I did some playing with this. It takes a while because the file is so
> big. I don't really know what's going on, but I did find t
I did some playing with this. It takes a while because the file is so
big. I don't really know what's going on, but I did find that deflate() is
returning at line 493 of zlib/deflate.c just after a comment that says
"this is not an error situation". So if I change like 285 of token.c to
delete
The newer zlib-1.1.3 patch still has the problem.
According to Dave Dykstra:
> I was able to reproduce this between a Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 machine with and
> without ssh, although I don't have any time to debug it today. Can
> somebody try applying Jos Backus latest zlib 1.1.3 upgrade patch to se
I was able to reproduce this between a Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 machine with and
without ssh, although I don't have any time to debug it today. Can
somebody try applying Jos Backus latest zlib 1.1.3 upgrade patch to see
if that helps?
- Dave
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:01:03PM -0800, Stuart Anderson
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:06:15PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:18:06PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > Be careful with that, because rsync's zlib is modified from the standard.
> > Has somebody verified that the modification is not removed with the upgrade?
>
> I was unde
According to Dave Dykstra:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:09:18AM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > According to sba:
>
> > > No I did not apply the patch, but I verified the same problem with
> > > rsync-2.4.8, is that sufficient?
>
> No, because rsync-2.4.8 include the same security patch that w
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:18:06PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Be careful with that, because rsync's zlib is modified from the standard.
> Has somebody verified that the modification is not removed with the upgrade?
I was under the erroneous assumption that these fixes had made it back into
zlib
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:09:18AM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> According to sba:
> > No I did not apply the patch, but I verified the same problem with
> > rsync-2.4.8, is that sufficient?
No, because rsync-2.4.8 include the same security patch that went into
2.5.2 last weekend. If you coul
According to Albert Chin:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:51:17AM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > I also found on deja-news reports that this is a known and fixed problem
> > with zlib-1.1.2. Any chance of rsync upgrading to zlib-1.1.3?
>
> Jos Backus posted a patch to do this a few days ago. Try
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:51:17AM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> I also found on deja-news reports that this is a known and fixed problem
> with zlib-1.1.2. Any chance of rsync upgrading to zlib-1.1.3?
Jos Backus posted a patch to do this a few days ago. Try applying his
patch and reporting bac
According to sba:
> According to Dave Dykstra:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:26:16PM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > > I am getting the following error when mirroring part of the RedHat
> > > distribution tree over a slow connection (~T1 speed). When running
> > > over a faster network (100Base
According to Dave Dykstra:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:26:16PM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> > I am getting the following error when mirroring part of the RedHat
> > distribution tree over a slow connection (~T1 speed). When running
> > over a faster network (100BaseT) the problem does not appe
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:26:16PM -0800, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> I am getting the following error when mirroring part of the RedHat
> distribution tree over a slow connection (~T1 speed). When running
> over a faster network (100BaseT) the problem does not appear. Note,
> the problem file a larg
14 matches
Mail list logo
