jw schultz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The rsync protocol wouldn't lend itself to this. Overall,
> rsync is going to be less efficient than a utility that
> simply sends what needs to be appended to reach the same
> length.
>
> I'd have the receiver send the
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +, Alun wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've only just joined this list, but I can't find any mention of this
> idea anywhere else, so I thought I'd just post here before getting too
> deep into programming and possibly reinventing the wheel.
>
> Here at Aber, we
Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ever considered using syslog, and sending all data to the central
> log server?
Thanks for the suggestion, but standard syslog is UDP and so not reliable (I
know about syslog-tng and friends) and some of the logs that w
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +, Alun wrote:
>
> Here at Aber, we have around 30 unix and linux servers doing core services.
> Each one is maintaining its own logfiles and, for various reasons, we want to
> keep these on the servers' local disks, with each server having its own log
> rot
