Andrew Gideon wrote:
> On the other hand, I recall that Oracle has its own replication engine
> for this purpose. As much as I like rsync, wouldn't it make more sense
> to use the Oracle-provided mechanism?
That was my first thought, too. If the OP is already paying for two
Oracle instances, r
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:23:24 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> but the non-atomicity of read(2) calls was not considered
If a frozen snapshot is constructed, then I don't see how read()'s
inatomicity (if that's a word {8^) would matter.
However, I see a related issue.
My experience with DB engine
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:25 -0700, Saibabu Devabhaktuni wrote:
> We currently use rsync to create an Oracle standby on a target box
> from an existing standby by copying all the datafiles while the source
> standby is in recovery status. We are occasionally running into
> datafile corruptions being
