On 12.04.2012 23:59, vijay patel wrote:
>
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am using rsync to copy data from Production File Server to Disaster
> Recovery file server. I have 100Mbps link setup between these two servers.
> Folder structure is very deep. It is having path like
> /reports/folder1/date/folder
on another folder structure. It is running
fine. Is there any option i can use with rsync to make this folder check
fast?
Regards,
Vijay
> From: matthew.st...@us.fujitsu.com
> To: k...@sanitarium.net; rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: Rsync takes long time to finish
> Date: Thu
On 04/12/2012 04:36:44 PM, vijay patel wrote:
>
> We are running Kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 which is latest in RHEL 5.8
> on both the server. I think i might have to explore option of using
> ext4.
Before you do anything you want to figure out why it
is slow so you can solve the real problem. vms
e: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:31:35 -0400 From: k...@sanitarium.net
>> To: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to
>> finish
>>
> There was also a serious performance regression in 2.6.39.
>
>
> On 04/12/12 17:29, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
>&g
We are running Kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 which is latest in RHEL 5.8 on both
the server. I think i might have to explore option of using ext4.
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:31:35 -0400
> From: k...@sanitarium.net
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Rsync takes long ti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There was also a serious performance regression in 2.6.39.
On 04/12/12 17:29, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> I've heard lots of good suggestions already - another thing that
> I've not seen mentioned is, upgrading your kernel may help.
> Somewhere shortly
I've heard lots of good suggestions already - another thing that I've not
seen mentioned is, upgrading your kernel may help. Somewhere shortly
before kernel 3.0, pathname lookups got noticeably faster.
You could also try an alternative filesystem like xfs. It's supposed to be
pretty good at larg
On 04/12/2012 04:19:47 PM, Kevin Korb wrote:
> Yes, you have the feature in your filesystem. Good.
(Note that you will want to check the filesystems on
both ends.)
Karl
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
--
Please use reply-all f
yes both servers are having rsync 3.0.6.
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:19:47 -0400
> From: k...@sanitarium.net
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to finish
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes, you have the featu
using rsync as
> daemon (Because i am confused with its usage at the moment), will
> it make any difference?
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:05:06 -0400 From: k...@sanitarium.net
>> To: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to
>> finish
>>
>
), will it make any difference?
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:05:06 -0400
> From: k...@sanitarium.net
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to finish
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And make sure both systems are runni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And make sure both systems are running rsync v3. It indexes in
parallel to the copying.
On 04/12/12 16:59, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 03:28:18 PM, vijay patel wrote:
>>
>> Thanks friends. We are using Redhat Linux 5.8 on Production and
>>
On 04/12/2012 03:28:18 PM, vijay patel wrote:
>
> Thanks friends. We are using Redhat Linux 5.8 on Production and
> Disaster Recovery side. By drilling down we have found out it is
> taking lot of time to check what has changed while data tranfer is
> very fast. As i mentioned data in these fol
structure. It is running fine. Is there any option i
can use with rsync to make this folder check fast?
Regards,
Vijay
> From: matthew.st...@us.fujitsu.com
> To: k...@sanitarium.net; rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: Rsync takes long time to finish
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19
Original Message-
From: rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Korb
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:44 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to finish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Several suggestion
-
From: rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Korb
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:44 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Rsync takes long time to finish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Several suggestions...
Add a lockfi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Several suggestions...
Add a lockfile to your cron job so it doesn't run two instances at the
same time and you don't have to predict the run time.
Make sure you are running rsync version 3+ on both systems. It has
significant performance benefits o
17 matches
Mail list logo
