;> thoughout the last hour or so and these are about my average
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> Why would rsync be so much slower? Is there something I can
>>> test to help figure this out? I'm using rsync on a couple dozen
>>> Windows servers and it's b
Korb"
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Sent: 2/10/2014 10:57:08 AM
Subject: Re: Rsync performance with large exchange database files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3.1.0 will probably help some.
What are the specs of the FreeBSD system? I have found that ZFS on
FreeBSD is extremel
/2014
> 10:57:08 AM Subject: Re: Rsync performance with large exchange
> database files
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> 3.1.0 will probably help some.
>>
>> What are the specs of the FreeBSD system? I have found that ZFS
>> o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3.1.0 will probably help some.
What are the specs of the FreeBSD system? I have found that ZFS on
FreeBSD is extremely RAM hungry. In my experience 8GB of RAM is the
minimum if dedup is disabled and 16BG of RAM for when dedup is enabled.
Also, a ca
-- Original Message --
From: br...@sqls.net
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Sent: 2/10/2014 8:38:06 AM
Subject: Rsync performance with large exchange database files
I'm using a mixture of FreeBSD w/ ZFS+snapshots and rsync to backup all
the servers at my day job. This works pretty good overa
