On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:30:55PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The current development rsync ignores all errors, but errors other
> than ENOSYS might be significant.
Yeah, good idea. I've changed the dev version to only ignore ENOSYS.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://li
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 22:20 +0100, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> I don't how to really fix into rsync,
> except checking uname to get the running kernel's version.
It would seem much more direct to simply attempt the lutimes and ignore
an error of ENOSYS (Function not implemented). I don't think it's
Le lundi 10 décembre 2007, Matt McCutchen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > It seems that people running the Debian 2.6.9-5.1 version which has this
> > patch applied. are running into problems where rsync wants to set
> > permissions on symlinks.
>
> In the re
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:20 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> It seems that people running the Debian 2.6.9-5.1 version which has this
> patch applied. are running into problems where rsync wants to set
> permissions on symlinks.
In the report rsync seems to want to set mtimes, not permissions.
> The
On Tue 27 Nov 2007, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> Starting with the 3.0.0-pre6 release, there will be a new daemon option
> available: "munge symlinks". This will allow an rsync daemon to accept
> symlinks and return them intact (with even a leading slash still there,
> which is new for a non-chroot d
