On 07/04/13 17:49, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:52:59 +0200 Bob von Knobloch wrote:
Thank you, it wasn't timestamps, but group id inconsistency (the source,
in this case is a Windows box, ids are always tricky).
...
I must rewrite the group ID after transfer, beca
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:52:59 +0200 Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> Thank you, it wasn't timestamps, but group id inconsistency (the source,
> in this case is a Windows box, ids are always tricky).
...
> I must rewrite the group ID after transfer, because the destination gid
> (special group), is neit
On 05/04/13 19:16, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:04:50 +0200 Bob von Knobloch wrote:
At the moment I also get a complete list of all directories that lie
under in rsync's target, whether they are updated or not.
Perhaps because the modify time of those directo
Hi.
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:04:50 +0200 Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> At the moment I also get a complete list of all directories that lie
> under in rsync's target, whether they are updated or not.
Perhaps because the modify time of those directories changes. Adding a
--itemize-changes option shou
