On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ed Coates wrote:
> http://kb8fzq.dyndns.org:81/~edcoates/9481.html
> http://kb8fzq.dyndns.org:81/~edcoates/9482.html
> http://kb8fzq.dyndns.org:81/~edcoates/9494.html
>
That second trace shows that rsync got an out-of-memory error in the
generator, signaled the r
Quoting Wayne Davison :
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Ed Coates wrote:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (338935497 bytes received so far)
[sender]
[...] Any clues on why it might be losing connection?
In a local connection the sender is the client side, so this is indicating
that t
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Ed Coates wrote:
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (338935497 bytes received so far)
> [sender]
> [...] Any clues on why it might be losing connection?
In a local connection the sender is the client side, so this is indicating
that the receiving side went
what version of rsync on each end?
what are the nss volume attributes?
im familiar with nss on netware but not on linux
there must be some kind of attribute mapping going on there.
can you create the following files to test a transfer:
A1.txt
a1.txt
A1A.txt
a1a.txt
A1a.txt
a1A.txt
tell us how t
It works!
Thanks again Matt!
2007/12/12, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:01 +0100, gorka barracuda wrote:
> > but, the second time that makes this re-rsync it takes the same time
> > that the first time...it seems that it doen't make an incremental
> > backup wit
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:01 +0100, gorka barracuda wrote:
> but, the second time that makes this re-rsync it takes the same time
> that the first time...it seems that it doen't make an incremental
> backup with our large files... Do you think that the cause could be
> the problem of the new optimiz
Hi Matt, thanks for your fastet reply
2007/12/12, Matt McCutchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 14:28 +0100, gorka barracuda wrote:
> > it seems that rsync is working and finishing but when appears the
> > message that summarizes the transferred files rsync starts the backup
> > ag
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 14:28 +0100, gorka barracuda wrote:
> it seems that rsync is working and finishing but when appears the
> message that summarizes the transferred files rsync starts the backup
> again (taking a lot of time)
>
>
> sent 640278263924 bytes received 217256421 bytes 8610488
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors:
*** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
0x0d757d58 ***
This looks like the same problem Sven Hartrumpf recently encountered
and descr
On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors:
>
> *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
> 0x0d757d58 ***
This looks like the same problem Sven Hartrumpf recently encountered
and described in this thread
Just changed by scripts and that was definately my
problem and its fixed.
Thank you
panos
--- Panos Koutsoyannis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah...That make sense. I do not stop it politely ..
> you are right. I will fix up the signal handling
> and
> give it whirl.
>
> Thanks
>
> Pan
Ah...That make sense. I do not stop it politely ..
you are right. I will fix up the signal handling and
give it whirl.
Thanks
Panos
--- Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon 24 Apr 2006, Panos Koutsoyannis wrote:
> >
> > - I use rsync over ssh to sync over our wan.
> > - I sync
On Mon 24 Apr 2006, Panos Koutsoyannis wrote:
>
> - I use rsync over ssh to sync over our wan.
> - I sync over an 8 hour window every night.
> - After 8 hours if the sync is not complete, it gets
> killed and restarts the next evening.
How do you kill it? Via kill -9?
> - I do notice a bunch .fi
On 2/3/05 2:56 PM, "Wayne Davison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:01:28PM -0800, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>> use --rsh="ssh -l username", that the rsync server is ignore my
>> rsyncd.conf uid and gid directives.
>
> Correct. Normal users don't have unix permissions to cha
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:01:28PM -0800, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> use --rsh="ssh -l username", that the rsync server is ignore my
> rsyncd.conf uid and gid directives.
Correct. Normal users don't have unix permissions to change to another
user, so rsync assumes that if you're not root (UID 0), you
I added the option that you mentioned and it actually got worse :(
Doesn't even appear to have checked the files.
--
Fri Apr 2 16:20:19 EST 2004
BEGIN NEW ENTRY FOR xxx.xxx.net
opening tcp connection to xxx.xxx.net port 873
receiving file list ...
done
delta transmiss
> Notice that *.* is used , i did this so that i can get all the files in
> the directory. I have also tried * as the variable.
What does this do? 'n' is test run, shows actions, moves nothing.
rsync -crzvvn --password-file /etc/rsync.passwd --bwlimit=120
rsync://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/critical_f
I gave you recommended a try but it doesn't seem to fix the issue.
Still recieving :
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (584 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)
I've checked to make sure it's not a network issue and everything seems
to be
> rsync -crzvv --password-file /etc/rsync.passwd --bwlimit=120
> rsync://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/critical_full_daily/*.* /STOR-1/ >>
> /var/log/rsync.xxx.pulls.xxx 2>&1
...
> Notice that *.* is used , i did this so that i can get all the files in
> the directory. I have also tried * as the variable
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:32:15AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> Hmm, just a thought here for the other developers: Perhaps
> rsync should check the source/dest portions of remote
> argument list for whitespace and if there but no quotes or
> backslashes insert backslashes or surrounding quotes.
One
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:55:38PM +0800, Nunuz Yourbiz wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have read read the why's and whyfores and howto's and whento's about
> posting for help, but I'm not sure whether this has already been addressed
> - plenty other Win/spaces-in-dir-names issues have been.
>
> I was r
I think you're experiencing the well known cygwin hang problem. My
suggestion is getting Craig Barratt's compiled package "cygwin-rsyncd"
from http://sourceforge.net/projects/backuppc/ and see if that works better.
/Greger
Ladd, Charles wrote:
Im trying to script an Rsync batch job to run mult
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:33:51PM -0400, Ladd, Charles wrote:
> Im trying to script an Rsync batch job to run multiple times a day to
> back up to Windows 2000 Servers. The Synch works great, but at the end
> of the job the command never exits.
I think you'll find that the command has exited, but
Thanks,
That syntax works.
I've just discovered the importance of the uid option in rsync.conf, and now
it seems to work.
Thanks to all who replied.
Jim
On Monday 17 March 2003 11:44 pm, you wrote:
> Try
>
> rsync -a /cygdrive/c/installs/palm 192.168.2.3::palm
>
> and make sure you have a c
Jim Gallagher wrote:
> $ rsync -a /cygdrive/c/installs/palm rsync://192.168.2.3/palm
> rsync: Unknown Host
> rsh.exe: can't establish connection <== ???
...
> I thought the docs said that rsync protocol would be used if I used
> the rsync:// URL. It still wants to use rsh. I'm
Try
rsync -a /cygdrive/c/installs/palm 192.168.2.3::palm
and make sure you have a correct [palm] section in
your rsyncd.conf file.
/Greger
--- Jim Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up rsync, with the transfers
> originating from a Win2K box
> and going to a Lin
i don't think you are actually getting connected to the target host. better check
your network settings. and on the second instance you appear to be having the same
problem, but you've masked it by saying RSYNC_RSH=rsync. That is not correct. rsync
is the transfer protocol...rsh is the conn
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:39:11AM -0500, David Rippel wrote:
> rsync_options="-aPvrz --progress --stats --delete --delete-after"
> rsync $rsync_options -e ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr2/docs/
> /export/export/www/current/www
> rsync $rsync_options -e ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr2/was/
> /export/expor
I'm not a programmer, nor is my boss willing to finance this :-) But we
use rsync for the time being exclusively on Windows as a means to back up
our entire WAN. If our expertise can be of any assistance, we'll be most
happy to help.
Rgds,
Bart Coninckx
Network Administrator
CNE, ASE
*
, December 20, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Ron Kelley
Cc: Rsync
Subject: Re: Problems with rsync on Win2K to Solaris
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:11:43AM -0500, Ron Kelley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having trouble getting rsync (v2.5.0 with the latest version of
cygwin)
> to work between my Win2K (SP2) and my
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:11:43AM -0500, Ron Kelley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having trouble getting rsync (v2.5.0 with the latest version of cygwin)
> to work between my Win2K (SP2) and my Solaris 2.6 server. Both machines are
> running the same version of rsync. Each time I run rsync, I get the
ECTED]
Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Problems with rsync 2.5.1pre1 and hardlinks
Classification:
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An additional hard link to an existing file takes only directory
> space, which, if it&
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An additional hard link to an existing file takes only directory
> space, which, if it's not enough of an addition to that directories
> existing data to cause the filesystem driver to add another
> allocation to the directories data space, takes up no m
call me Tim?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/11/2001 11:42 PM
To: Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:Re: Problems with rsync 2.5.1pre1 and hardlinks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:53:56AM +0100:
[...]
*
* 'Twas long ago when I did swap-on-a-file as shown above by you. Anyway, I
* succeeded both in upgrading RAM as well as adding an additional swapfile
* and it was confirmed indeed that memory was the problem: the kernel
Martin Pool schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:40:19PM +1100:
* On 10 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* > * Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
* > * perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
* > * on the backup server?
*
* OK. To
Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:46PM -0600:
[...]
* >
* > *
* > * Ideas:
* > * 1. Would it be possible to use symlinks instead of hardlinks? That
* > * would give you more flexibility to split things up however you
* > * like.
* > * 2. Perhaps you could break it u
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:18:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:26PM -0600:
> * > I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
> * > directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
> * > "ori
Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:26PM -0600:
* > I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
* > directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
* > "orig data" directory, I have about 30.000 files, so the amount of files
* > to
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:51:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got stuck within some weird prob concerning my 2-node linux cluster and
> the synchronisation tool at hand (rsync-2.5.1pre1).
>
> I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
> directories
On 10 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
> * perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
> * on the backup server?
OK. To help you out until then, you can do something like this
# dd if=/dev/ze
Martin Pool schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 08:20:47AM +1100:
* Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Nope, none - the server thinks it has done all transfers (despite having
its childs still clinging to some 200MB mem...) successfully.
*
* Running out of memory may be th
Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
on the backup server?
The rsync hlink code seems to use a bit more memory than is really
necess
On Tuesday 27 February 2001 17:11, Arne Hueggenberg wrote:
> Hi,
dont i just love replying to myself ;-)
me bad, me stupid
Of course the Problem was the Harddisk running full, must have had my dark
glasses on when checking the disk capacity :-(
> im using rsync to keep a local copy of my webse
> I have been using rsync on an irix machine for months, I rebooted the
> machine yesterday now when i try to start a daemon of it i get this error,
> anybody got a clue on what is up with it
Jon,
Check your /etc/hosts and dns config.
>
> ec 21 08:11:16 6T:jumbo rsyncd[13892]: rsyncd versi
On 28 Nov 2000, Sergi Musach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi , i´m trying to do a security backup from one linux red hat 6.1 in one
> server called "malaga" to another linux red hat 6.2 in one server called
> "Bart"
>
> i, m trying this instruction " rsync -avz $admin@malaga:home/malaga
> $roo
46 matches
Mail list logo
