On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:45:22PM -0800, Drake Diedrich wrote:
> I'd like to make these utilities use the same hash structure and
> race-avoidance an rsync hashdir-patch uses.
That patch still needs work as it doesn't do a proper job of maintaining
differing file attributes for files with otherwi
I'm using a few utilities to accomplish the same thing in a second pass
after rsync runs. The utils all use a two-layer hash (256 directories of
256 subdirectories), which with our current backups puts a little over 100
files per directory. Anywhere from hundreds of thousands to tens of
millio
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:29:34PM +0100, Helge Jensen wrote:
> In order to reduce the space used for each backup, I was thinking about
> linking all files in the backups to their hash in a separate directory,
> allowing only one storage of each file-value, reducing my backup-needs
> with ~5Gb p
On Fri 03 Dec 2004, Helge Jensen wrote:
>
> In order to reduce the space used for each backup, I was thinking about
> linking all files in the backups to their hash in a separate directory,
> allowing only one storage of each file-value, reducing my backup-needs
> with ~5Gb per machince.
>
> F
