Hello Wayne,
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 06:51:37AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote:
> > So I'd need a clear indication whether source and target are identical
> > - files (incl. mtime!), symlinks, devices, directories, everywhere
> > owner, group, and mode,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 06:51:37AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote:
> So I'd need a clear indication whether source and target are identical
> - files (incl. mtime!), symlinks, devices, directories, everywhere
> owner, group, and mode, and in the near future possibly xattr too ..
That's what -i is for. I
Hello Mike,
thank you for you answer.
On Dienstag, 15. April 2008, Mike Bombich wrote:
> For stats, rsync uses the word "file" inconsistently. When reporting
> the total "Number of files", it indicates a total number of filesystem
> objects which consists of regular files, directories, symlinks,
For stats, rsync uses the word "file" inconsistently. When reporting
the total "Number of files", it indicates a total number of filesystem
objects which consists of regular files, directories, symlinks,
specials, and devices. When reporting number of "files" transferred,
it refers only t
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 10:11 -0400, Jon wrote:
> During testing, I completely removed everything from my testing dir
> and then ran an rsync into it from another directory on the same
> machine into this directory. When the transfer was complete, I had the
> entire /etc /var and /root dirs in my tes
Hi All,
This is a continuation of a thread I started some time ago at
http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg19852.html
The first occurrence of this problem seems to have just gone away and
all was good for a week or so. I have now seen this same behaviour
again, though.
I'm not su
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 11:29 -0400, Jon wrote:
> One piece of information that I forgot to
> mention in my original post is that the second rsync takes about 3
> seconds. There are no files transferred on the second rsync yet the
> 293 are being reported.
>
> If the files were actually being transf
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:33 -0400, Jon wrote:
> I'm so confused as to what keeps happening to my subject. I started
> this thread as something like "Number of files transferred is wrong"
> and the two replies I've received so far have totally different
> subjects.
In the copy of your message that
