Re: Max number of files to transfer

2006-07-07 Thread Adrian Cooke
Wayne Davison wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:59:54PM -0400, Bob Bagwill wrote: You probably already considered this, but you could also do something like this: [...] That divides the entire file-list up into 50-file chunks, whereas I believe that the original poster wanted to allow 50 dif

Re: Max number of files to transfer

2006-07-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:59:54PM -0400, Bob Bagwill wrote: > You probably already considered this, but you could also do something > like this: [...] That divides the entire file-list up into 50-file chunks, whereas I believe that the original poster wanted to allow 50 differing files to be upda

Re: Max number of files to transfer

2006-07-06 Thread Bob Bagwill
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:53:30 -0400, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Adrian Cooke wrote: Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at one time? No, that is not something that rsync supports. It would be fairly easy

Re: Max number of files to transfer

2006-07-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Adrian Cooke wrote: > Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files > at one time? No, that is not something that rsync supports. It would be fairly easy to add such a check into the generator.c code, but I'm not presently inclined